Home/Comparisons/Wrike vs Asana
2026 PLAN-BY-PLAN BUYER GUIDE
Wrike for complex delivery. Asana for effortless coordination.
Compare the specific plans that include scheduling, workload, portfolios, time tracking and approval workflows—before add-ons and upgrades change the cost.
Wrike Business is geared toward structured project management; Asana Advanced emphasizes cross-team visibility. If multi-project capacity and financial control are essential, keep Celoxis in the evaluation.
✓ Pricing checked 1 Nov 2026 · ✓ Official vendor references · ✓ Feature eligibility by plan
THE QUICK CALL
Wrike
Scheduling, structured intake and creative approvals
Asana
Adoption, team coordination and goal visibility
Celoxis
Resource capacity, project financials and PPM
EXPLORE THE COMPARISON
Before you compare
Match requirements to the plan that includes them
Most teams choose between Wrike and Asana from a feature grid. The trouble shows up a few months later. The workload view only covers one portfolio, budgets need a higher tier or an add-on, and finance still rebuilds hours and costs in spreadsheets. Each workaround adds licenses, connectors, and manual reporting nobody budgeted for. The fix is simple: match your requirements to the plan that actually includes them before you sign. Every comparison below is tied to a named plan and an official source.
$10 vs $10.99
Entry paid plan per user per month, billed annually (Wrike Team vs Asana Starter)
Business vs Advanced
Lowest tier with critical path in Wrike and in Asana
10 feature areas
Compared with the same buyer-first pattern
3-way shortlist
Wrike, Asana, and Celoxis on the same criteria
At a glance
Wrike vs Asana at a glance
The short version: Wrike gives you more scheduling and resource depth per dollar at the mid tier. Asana is easier to roll out across departments and makes you move up a tier, or buy an add-on, for capacity and cost control.
↔ On a phone, swipe the comparison tables sideways to see every column.
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Workflows | Custom workflows, request forms, and dynamic forms with conditional logic from Business. Task and project approvals from Business. Automation actions are capped per seat each month. | Forms, custom templates, and rules from Starter (pricing page lists unlimited automations). Forms branching up to five levels. Approvals from Advanced. |
| Scheduling | Gantt chart from Team with all four dependency types and automatic rescheduling of dependents. Critical path and baseline tracking from Business. | Gantt view from Starter with all four dependency types and auto-shifting. Critical path from Advanced (up to 2,000 dated tasks). One baseline per project. |
| Resources | Workload charts, effort allocation, and resource assignment from Business. Job roles, bookings, skills, and utilization dashboard on Pinnacle. | Project and portfolio workload from Advanced. Capacity planning and universal workload on Enterprise and Enterprise+. |
| Reporting | Dashboards from Team, real-time reports from Business, advanced analytics and BI on Pinnacle. | Reporting dashboards from Starter. Portfolios and goals from Advanced, with Tableau and Power BI integrations. |
| Time and cost | Time tracking and timesheets from Business. Budgeting with hourly rates on Pinnacle and Apex. | Estimated vs actual time on Advanced. Timesheets and Budgets is a paid add-on for Starter and above. |
| Pricing (annual billing) | Free $0, Team $10, Business $25 per user per month. Pinnacle and Apex on quote. | Personal $0, Starter $10.99, Advanced $24.99 per user per month. Enterprise and Enterprise+ on quote. |
| Key restrictions | Team is limited to 2 to 15 users and Business to 5 to 200 users. Business and above are annual only. SAML SSO and audit reports start at Pinnacle. | Personal allows up to 2 seats per project and team. SAML and SCIM need Enterprise. Proofing covers PDF, PNG, JPG, GIF, and BMP files only. |
Methodology
How we evaluated Wrike and Asana
We built this comparison from each vendor’s own pricing pages, plan comparison tables, help center articles, and trust pages. Here is exactly what we looked at, what we did not test, and how to read the results.
- 01
Products and plans reviewed
- Wrike: Free, Team, Business, Pinnacle, Apex, plus add-ons (Integrate, Sync, Datahub, Lock, AI Elite action packs)
- Asana: Personal, Starter, Advanced, Enterprise, Enterprise+, plus Timesheets and Budgets, Compliance, and Permissions add-ons
- Celoxis: Core, Essentials, Professional, Business, Enterprise
- 02
Dates and evaluator
Documentation review completed October 8, 2026. Wrike prices reflect its pricing for new purchases on or after January 21, 2026.
Evaluator: Kiran More, Senior Marketing Executive with 5 years of experience in SaaS, including project management software.
- 03
Scenarios we compared
- Plan a 60-task project with dependencies, then slip one task and watch the schedule
- Route an intake request to approval
- Find who is overbooked across five projects
- Log time and compare planned vs actual cost
- Build a monthly portfolio report for leadership
- 04
Sources
Official pricing and plan comparison pages, vendor help centers (help.wrike.com, help.asana.com), vendor trust and security pages, and Celoxis pricing, features, and security pages. Third-party review sites were not used for capability claims.
- 05
What we did not test
We did not run hands-on trials for this version, so performance, ease of use, and support quality are not scored. Quote-only plans (Wrike Pinnacle and Apex, Asana Enterprise and Enterprise+, Celoxis Enterprise) were not priced. AI output quality was not measured.
- 06
Limitations
Vendors change plans often. Where a vendor’s own pages disagree, we say so and tell you what to confirm. Some Wrike help articles apply to accounts created before October 4, 2024, so newer accounts should confirm behavior in the current help center.
Pricing
Wrike vs Asana Pricing Comparison
At list price, the two products sit within a dollar of each other at each tier. The real difference is what each tier unlocks, and which needs push you into a quote-only plan or an add-on.
↔ On a phone, swipe the comparison tables sideways to see every column.
| Tier | Wrike (per user / month, billed annually) | Asana (per user / month) |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free: $0. Board and table views, project and task management, web, desktop, and mobile apps. 2 GB storage per account. | Personal: $0. Unlimited tasks and projects, list, board, and calendar views. Up to 2 seats per project and team. |
| Entry paid | Team: $10. 2 to 15 users. Gantt chart, dashboards, calendars, AI Essentials, 50 automation actions per seat each month. | Starter: $10.99 annual or $13.49 monthly. No seat limit. Timeline and Gantt, dashboards, forms, rules, custom fields, unlimited free guests, AI Studio. |
| Mid tier | Business: $25. 5 to 200 users, annual only. Baselines, critical path, workload, time tracking, request forms, approvals, proofing, 200 automation actions per seat each month. | Advanced: $24.99 annual or $30.49 monthly. Portfolios, goals, approvals and proofing, critical path, portfolio workload, estimated vs actual time. |
| Upper tiers | Pinnacle and Apex: quote. Budgeting, job roles, bookings, BI, SAML SSO, custom roles, audit reports. Apex includes Integrate, Sync, Datahub, and Whiteboard. | Enterprise and Enterprise+: quote. SAML, SCIM, capacity planning, universal workload, view-only licenses. Enterprise+ adds advanced security and compliance options. |
| Paid add-ons | Whiteboard $15 per user per month. Integrate, Sync, Datahub, Lock, and AI Elite action packs on quote. | Timesheets and Budgets ($5.99 per user per month billed annually, per Asana’s add-on page). Compliance and Permissions add-ons for Enterprise. |
What pricing pages don’t tell you
Four details that change the real cost once a team starts growing.
- Wrike’s Business plan is annual only, and its Team plan stops at 15 users. A growing team can be forced into Business sooner than planned.
- Asana’s Starter has no seat cap and offers monthly billing, which suits teams that want to start small.
- In Wrike, cost budgeting needs Pinnacle, which has no public price. In Asana, budgets come through an add-on on any paid plan.
- Wrike AI Elite actions and Asana AI usage both have monthly allowances. Heavy AI use can mean buying more.
Worked example: 20 people, annual billing
Requirement: Gantt with dependencies, baselines, workload view, and logged time.
- Wrike Business: 20 × $25 = $500 per month ($6,000 per year). Budgets not included.
- Asana Advanced + Timesheets and Budgets: 20 × ($24.99 + $5.99) = $619.60 per month ($7,435.20 per year). Includes budgets; workload is project and portfolio scoped.
List prices only. Your quote, discounts, and seat mix will change these numbers.
Feature by feature
Wrike vs Asana Feature By Feature Comparison
Each feature area follows the same pattern, so you can compare what you need instead of reading vendor claims side by side.
↔ On a phone, swipe the comparison tables sideways to see every column.
- Includedin the named plan
- Higher planrequires a tier above entry paid
- Add-onpaid separately
- Limitdocumented restriction
Task ownership, collaboration, and work organization
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Every task needs a clear owner, the right people involved, a structure that scales from one team to a department, and a way to handle recurring work. | |
| Behavior | Tasks can have more than one assignee. Work is organized in spaces, folders, projects, tasks, and subtasks, and a single task can live in several folders or projects at once. Viewers are free on every plan, which helps when clients or other departments only need to see work. Recurring tasks are supported. | Each task has one assignee, with other people added as collaborators. Work sits in projects, sections, tasks, and subtasks, and one task can belong to several projects. Unlimited free guests start at Starter, portfolios start at Advanced, and recurring tasks are supported. |
| Evidence and plan | Free+ viewers Business custom item types and templates. Source: Wrike plan comparison. | Starter free guests Advanced portfolios. Source: Asana pricing. |
| Trade-off | Multiple assignees reflect how shared work really happens, but they can blur who is accountable. | A single assignee keeps accountability crisp, but shared deliverables need to be split into subtasks. |
| Recommendation | Choose Wrike if work spans many teams and you need custom item types and stricter structure. | Choose Asana if one-owner accountability is a priority and teams want a quick start. |
Gantt charts, dependencies, and scheduling
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Model task dependencies, see what happens when a date slips, find the critical path, and compare the plan against a baseline. | |
| Behavior | Supports finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, and start-to-finish dependencies, plus lead and lag, date constraints, and project-level dependencies. When you reschedule a task, all dependent active tasks reschedule automatically. Critical path highlights tasks that would move the finish date, and the New Gantt Chart shows total float and free float. Baseline tracking and Gantt snapshots let you compare plan vs actual. | Supports the same four dependency types, and each works with auto-shifting dates. Critical path highlights the longest chain of linked tasks in the timeline. Baselines show the original plan as hatched bars against the current plan. |
| Evidence and plan | Team Gantt and dependencies Business critical path, baselines. Sources: Wrike task dependencies, Wrike critical path. | Starter Gantt and dependency types Advanced critical path Limit 1 baseline per project, critical path up to 2,000 dated tasks, subtasks excluded. Sources: Asana dependency types, Asana critical path, Asana Gantt view. |
| Trade-off | Gives you float values and a fuller set of scheduling controls one tier lower than Asana’s critical path. | Keeps scheduling simpler, but a single baseline per project and excluded subtasks limit variance tracking on complex plans. |
| Recommendation | For schedule-driven delivery with frequent re-baselining, Wrike Business is the stronger value. | For milestone-driven timelines where ease matters more than float analysis, Asana Starter or Advanced is enough. |
Request forms, automation, and approvals
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Turn incoming requests into the right task or project, route them based on answers, automate handoffs, and get formal sign-off. | |
| Behavior | Request forms and dynamic request forms create tasks or projects, often from a blueprint. Answers can change the status, workflow, and assignees of what gets created, and can trigger an approval. Custom approval flows cover tasks and projects. Automation runs on a monthly action allowance per seat. | Forms create tasks in a project, and branching uses single-select and multi-select questions up to five levels deep. Rules automate routing and updates, and Asana’s pricing page lists unlimited automations from Starter. Approvals sit alongside proofing on Advanced. |
| Evidence and plan | Business request forms, dynamic forms, approvals Limit automation actions per seat each month: Team 50, Business 200, Pinnacle 1,500, Apex 3,000. Source: Wrike conditional status in forms. | Starter forms and rules Advanced approvals. Source: Asana forms branching. |
| Trade-off | Forms do more on submission, but automation action caps need watching at scale. | The help center lists forms branching from Starter while the pricing page places “forms with branching” under Advanced, so confirm on your plan before you design intake around it. |
| Recommendation | High-volume intake with routing and formal approvals fits Wrike Business. | Lightweight team intake fits Asana Starter, moving to Advanced when approvals become mandatory. |
Resource workload and capacity planning
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | See who is overbooked across projects, plan with effort estimates and real availability, and staff shared people by role or skill. | |
| Behavior | Business includes the resources view, workload charts, effort allocation, and resource assignment. Pinnacle adds job roles, resource bookings, user skills, asset scheduling, task-level work schedules, and a utilization dashboard. | Advanced includes project and portfolio workload. Capacity planning and universal workload, which show people across all their work, are limited to Enterprise and Enterprise+. Asana’s add-on page lists placeholder roles and cost layering on Enterprise plans. |
| Evidence and plan | Business workload, effort Pinnacle roles, bookings, utilization. Source: Wrike plan comparison. | Advanced project and portfolio workload Enterprise capacity planning, universal workload. Source: Asana Timesheets and Budgets help. |
| Trade-off | Reaches a cross-project workload view at a published price, but role-based planning sits on Pinnacle. | A view across everything someone works on requires a quote-only plan, and role-based planning also sits on the top tiers. |
| Recommendation | If you need person-level workload across projects on a known budget, start with Wrike Business. | If you plan by role and capacity across a large organization, compare an Asana Enterprise quote side by side with Wrike Pinnacle. |
Time tracking, budgets, and project costs
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Capture hours against work, approve timesheets, apply rates, and compare planned against actual cost without exporting to spreadsheets. | |
| Behavior | Time tracking and timesheets are native from Business. Budgeting on Pinnacle and Apex sets default hourly rates by user and job role, custom rates per project, and calculates planned and actual fees and costs. QuickBooks connects on Pinnacle, NetSuite from Business. | Advanced adds time tracking that compares estimated and actual effort. The Timesheets and Budgets add-on adds timesheet submit and approve flows, billable and non-billable entries, per-project user rates, project budgets, and time and cost reports. On Advanced, the add-on also covers portfolio budgets and profitability reporting. |
| Evidence and plan | Business time tracking Pinnacle budgeting. Source: Budgeting in Wrike. | Add-on Timesheets and Budgets for Starter, Advanced, Enterprise, Enterprise+. Source: Asana Timesheets and Budgets. |
| Trade-off | Budgeting is built in, but only on quote-only tiers. | The add-on is cheaper to reach but is licensed per user and admin-assigned. Approved timesheets lock, and workload time views show one project at a time. |
| Recommendation | For rate-driven budgeting inside the same system as roles and bookings, look at Wrike Pinnacle. | For time-based client budgets on a predictable bill, Asana with the add-on is a practical choice. |
Portfolio reporting and dashboards
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | See status across all projects, drill from summary to detail, set reports up without a specialist, and export or connect data to BI. | |
| Behavior | Dashboards arrive on Team and real-time reports on Business. Program and portfolio timelines can be built in the Gantt chart. Pinnacle adds advanced analytics, a BI API, Tableau, and native Power BI. Wrike Datahub adds records for combined data, with 10K included on Pinnacle and 30M on Apex. | Reporting dashboards start at Starter. Advanced adds unlimited portfolios and goals, so leaders can follow progress across projects and tie it to outcomes. Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI integrations start at Advanced. |
| Evidence and plan | Team dashboards Business reports Pinnacle BI and analytics. Source: Wrike plan comparison. | Starter dashboards Advanced portfolios, goals, BI connectors. Source: Asana pricing. |
| Trade-off | Deeper analytics tooling, but much of it sits on quote-only tiers or paid Datahub capacity. | Portfolios and goals make leadership reporting easy to read, but cost data needs the add-on. |
| Recommendation | For data-heavy reporting that feeds BI tools, Wrike Pinnacle is the stronger base. | For goal-linked executive views, Asana Advanced is easy to adopt. |
Creative proofing and client collaboration
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Mark up creative files, collect feedback from clients or stakeholders who are not licensed users, and record formal approval. | |
| Behavior | File proofing, file approval, and guest approvals start at Business. Pinnacle adds advanced proofing for HTML5 and SharePoint files. An Adobe Creative Cloud extension and DAM connections start at Business, and free viewers work on every plan. | Approvals and proofing start at Advanced. Proofing supports PDF, PNG, JPG, GIF, and BMP files. Unlimited free guests start at Starter, and Enterprise adds guest invitation permissions. |
| Evidence and plan | Business proofing, guest approvals Pinnacle HTML5 proofing. Source: Wrike plan comparison. | Advanced approvals and proofing Limit image and PDF formats only. Source: Asana feedback and approvals. |
| Trade-off | Handles more file types and fits Adobe-based teams better. | Proofing is simpler and good for static assets, but video and HTML5 reviews need another tool. |
| Recommendation | Agencies and in-house creative teams should lean toward Wrike. | Teams that review the occasional PDF or image can stay with Asana Advanced. |
Integrations and data portability
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Connect the tools you already pay for, know which connectors cost extra, and be able to get your data out later. | |
| Behavior | An open REST API and cloud storage connections are available on every plan. Team adds Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Microsoft Project, Excel, and Slack. Business adds native Salesforce, NetSuite, and Adobe CC. Pinnacle adds QuickBooks and native Power BI. Wrike Integrate and Wrike Sync are paid add-ons on Business and Pinnacle and are included in Apex. | More than 100 free integrations on every plan. Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI integrations start at Advanced. Asana’s pricing page also lists a two-way Jira Cloud sync. |
| Evidence and plan | All plans API and cloud storage Add-on Integrate and Sync below Apex. Source: Wrike plan comparison. | All plans 100+ free integrations Advanced CRM and BI connectors. Source: Asana pricing. |
| Trade-off | Deeper two-way syncs come at extra cost below Apex. | The catalog is broad and free, but the deepest connectors still need Advanced. |
| Recommendation | For either tool, list every connector you need, mark which are paid, and test an export of one full project during the trial. Confirm that custom fields, dependency types, and history export cleanly before you commit. | |
Permissions, security, and administration
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Control who sees and edits what, connect your identity provider, keep an audit trail, and meet data location or key management rules. | |
| Behavior | Business adds folder and project permissions and company-wide administration. Pinnacle adds SAML 2.0 SSO, two-step verification, IP whitelisting, password policies, custom roles, customizable user types, Locked Spaces, and user audit reports. Wrike Lock, an add-on for Pinnacle, gives you ownership of the master encryption key through AWS Key Management Service. | Google and Microsoft SSO are listed on the pricing page. Enterprise adds SAML, SCIM provisioning, service accounts, guest invitation permissions, and project admin controls. The Compliance add-on (audit logs, SIEM, eDiscovery, DLP, IP allowlisting) and the Permissions add-on (custom roles) are for Enterprise. Data residency, Enterprise Key Management, and opt-in HIPAA support are offered for enterprise customers, subject to eligibility. |
| Evidence and plan | Pinnacle SSO, 2SV, audit Add-on Lock. Sources: Wrike plan comparison, Wrike Lock. | Enterprise SAML, SCIM Add-on Compliance, Permissions. Sources: Asana pricing, Asana Trust Center. |
| Trade-off | No SAML SSO on the published mid-tier plan, but more controls are bundled into Pinnacle. | No SAML on the published mid-tier plan, and audit and custom role controls are split into Enterprise add-ons. |
| Recommendation | If IT requires SAML from day one, budget for Wrike Pinnacle or Asana Enterprise and ask each for an itemized quote that includes the controls you need. | |
AI features, allowances, and controls
| Criteria | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer requirement | Use AI for real work, such as summaries, drafting rules and forms, and answering status questions, with clear usage limits and human review. | |
| Behavior | AI Essentials (onboarding assistant, content editing, comment summaries) is on every plan. Team adds AI highlights and natural-language automation rule generation, and Business adds natural-language form generation. AI Elite (Wrike Copilot, widget generation, agents) starts on Business with a starter pack of actions. Pinnacle includes 3 times and Apex 10 times more AI Elite actions per month. Overages are not invoiced automatically; Wrike opens a usage discussion instead. | AI Teammates, Asana Dash, and AI Studio start at Starter. AI Studio runs on monthly credits per billing account that grow with each tier, and AI Teammates requests have their own monthly limits. Extra usage can be bought. |
| Evidence and plan | Free+ AI Essentials Business AI Elite starter pack Limit monthly action allowance. Source: Wrike pricing. | Starter AI Studio and AI Teammates Limit monthly credits and requests. Source: Asana pricing. |
| Trade-off | The most capable AI (AI Elite) is metered by monthly actions, and allowances that feel generous in a pilot can run short at department scale. | AI Studio and AI Teammates are metered by monthly credits and requests, so heavy automation use can mean buying more. |
| Recommendation | Pick two or three AI tasks you will use weekly, run them during the trial, and ask each vendor for the monthly allowance on your exact plan. Keep a person reviewing AI-generated rules, forms, and status summaries before they go live. | |
Trust
Asana vs. Wrike Security, Compliance & Reliability
Both vendors hold the main SOC 2 and ISO certifications. The differences are in data location, key management, and which plan unlocks the controls your security team will ask about.
| Control | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, and 27701. | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, and 27701, CSA STAR Level 1. |
| Regulatory | Check HIPAA and sector needs with Wrike directly; not stated on the pages we reviewed. | GDPR, HIPAA (opt-in), US state privacy laws, GLBA, FERPA, and APPI listed on the Trust Center. |
| SSO and sign-in | Google SSO on all plans. SAML 2.0 SSO, two-step verification, IP whitelisting, and password policy on Pinnacle and Apex. | Google and Microsoft SSO listed. SAML and SCIM on Enterprise. |
| Roles and audit | Custom roles and user audit reports on Pinnacle and Apex. | Custom roles via the Permissions add-on and audit logs via the Compliance add-on, both for Enterprise. |
| Data location | Based on sign-up region: European accounts hosted in Paris, others in Santa Clara, California. | Data residency options with data centers in Europe, Australia, and Japan. |
| Encryption keys | Wrike Lock add-on: customer-owned master key in AWS KMS. | Enterprise Key Management, subject to eligibility. |
| Reliability | Wrike states uptime over 99.9% (a published figure, not a stated SLA). | 99.9% uptime commitment for Enterprise customers. |
Fit by team
Which tool fits your team’s work?
The better tool depends on the work you run every week. Here is how the evidence above plays out for four common buyers.
Usually Wrike
Creative operations
Wrike’s proofing covers more file types, adds HTML5 proofing on Pinnacle, and connects to Adobe Creative Cloud from Business. Guest approvals let clients sign off without a license.
Asana is the better fit when reviews are mostly PDFs and images and the team values a simpler interface over proofing depth.
Usually Asana
Departmental workflows
Marketing, HR, and operations teams adopt Asana quickly. Forms, rules, and templates start at Starter with no seat cap and monthly billing, and goals on Advanced tie work to outcomes.
Wrike is the better fit when each department needs its own custom item types, workflows, and stricter permissions.
Depends on billing model
Client delivery
If you bill on time and want approved timesheets, Asana with Timesheets and Budgets is easy to reach. If you need rate-based budgets tied to job roles, Wrike Pinnacle covers it in one system.
Consider Celoxis when expenses, invoicing, profitability, and a client portal are all part of delivery.
Wrike, then compare Celoxis
Multi-project teams and PMOs
Wrike Business gives critical path, baselines, and cross-project workload at a published price. Asana reaches universal workload and capacity planning only on Enterprise.
Consider Celoxis when shared resources, schedule control, and portfolio financials must sit in one place.
Before you switch
What to check before migrating
Most migration problems come from what a CSV can’t carry. Run a pilot import of one complex project and check each item below before you move everyone.
- 01
Imports
Which formats does the target accept (CSV, Excel, Microsoft Project)? Does it import tasks, subtasks, and sections in one pass?
- 02
Field mapping
Map every custom field, status, and dropdown value. Check how multi-assignee tasks in Wrike will land in Asana’s single-assignee model.
- 03
Attachments
Confirm whether files move with tasks or need a separate transfer, and whether proofing comments survive.
- 04
Dependencies
Verify dependency types, lead and lag, and dates after import. A plan that imports as finish-to-start only will reschedule differently.
- 05
History
Comments, activity logs, and time entries often don’t transfer. Decide what to archive and where people will find it.
- 06
Permissions
Rebuild roles, guest access, and private spaces before go-live. Check that SSO and provisioning are ready on the plan you bought.
- 07
Integrations
List every connector and automation. Rebuild and test them, and confirm which require a paid add-on in the new tool.
- 08
Rollback plan
Keep the old system read-only, not deleted, until a full reporting cycle matches. Set a date and owner for the final cutover decision.
Where Celoxis fits
When to consider Celoxis alongside Wrike and Asana
Celoxis is a project portfolio management platform built for teams that plan shared people across many projects and track the financial side of delivery. It is not the right pick for every team. These are the three requirements where it belongs in the evaluation.
You need to coordinate shared resources across multiple projects
When the same engineers, consultants, or designers work on five projects at once, a per-project workload view hides the conflicts that matter.
| Criteria | Celoxis | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it works | Workload is read across every project a person is booked on and shown as a heatmap. Allocation considers availability, demand, and skills, across multiple locations, shifts, and time zones, with analytics by role, skill, or custom field. | Resources view, workload charts, effort allocation, and resource assignment. Pinnacle adds job roles, resource bookings, user skills, and a utilization dashboard. | Project and portfolio workload. Capacity planning and universal workload show people across all their work. |
| Required tier | Workload tracking and capacity planning are listed in every plan. Essentials $25 adds job roles, work calendars, and instant resource-conflict visibility, which most multi-project teams need. | Business $25 workload charts and effort allocation. Pinnacle (quote) job roles, bookings, skills, and utilization dashboards. | Advanced $24.99 project and portfolio workload. Enterprise (quote) universal workload and capacity planning. |
| Watch for | Minimum of 5 full-access users and annual billing. | Role-based planning sits on a quote-only tier. | A view of people across all their work sits on quote-only tiers. |
Project financials are part of your purchase requirements
If finance needs budgets, costs, expenses, and margins from the same system that holds the schedule, add-ons and exports become an ongoing tax.
| Criteria | Celoxis | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it works | Timesheets with built-in timers and multi-level approvals feed costing. Budgets can be set at project and task level for labor and material, with job-role based costing, expenses logged against projects or tasks, revenue forecasting, invoicing, and profit and margin tracking by project and portfolio. | Native time tracking and timesheets. Budgeting sets default hourly rates by user and job role, custom rates per project, and planned vs actual fees and costs. QuickBooks on Pinnacle, NetSuite from Business. | Timesheets and Budgets add-on: submit and approve timesheets, billable and non-billable entries, per-project user rates, project budgets, and time and cost reports. Portfolio budgets and profitability reporting when paired with Advanced. |
| Required tier | Essentials $25 timesheets (a $5 per user add-on on Core). Professional $35 expenses and project costing. Business $45 project billing and the client portal. | Business $25 time tracking. Pinnacle and Apex (quote) budgeting. | Add-on $5.99 per user per month, billed annually, on Starter, Advanced, Enterprise, and Enterprise+. |
| Watch for | Billing and the client portal start at the Business tier. | No public price for the tiers that include budgeting. | The add-on is licensed per user and admin-assigned, and approved timesheets lock. |
Your team needs scheduling and portfolio oversight in the same evaluation
PMOs often buy a scheduler and a reporting layer separately, then spend months reconciling them. Some teams need both in one tool from day one.
| Criteria | Celoxis | Wrike | Asana |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it works | All four dependency types with lead and lag, inter-project dependencies, automatic scheduling from your work calendars, critical path, and baselines with plan vs actual and earned value. Portfolio dashboards roll up with RAG health and drill down from chart to record. | Four dependency types with lead and lag, automatic rescheduling, critical path with float, baseline tracking and snapshots, real-time reports, and portfolio timelines in the Gantt chart. Advanced analytics and BI on Pinnacle. | Four dependency types with auto-shifting, critical path, and one baseline per project. Portfolios and goals help connect projects to outcomes. |
| Required tier | Core $10 Gantt scheduling and baselines. Essentials $25 work calendars and automatic RAG calculation. Professional $35 intake and risk management. Business $45 strategic portfolio management. | Team $10 Gantt and dependencies. Business $25 critical path, baselines, and reports. Pinnacle (quote) BI and advanced analytics. | Starter $10.99 Gantt and dependencies. Advanced $24.99 critical path, portfolios, and goals. |
| Watch for | Visual creative proofing is not listed among Celoxis features. | Analytics depth sits on quote-only tiers. | One baseline per project, and critical path is capped at 2,000 dated tasks. |
Where Wrike or Asana stays the better fit: Celoxis does not list visual creative proofing among its features, requires at least 5 full-access users, and bills annually. Teams focused on creative review, lightweight departmental workflows, or a very small start are often better served by Wrike or Asana.
Shortlist
Wrike vs Asana vs Celoxis: Compare Best Project Management Software
The same criteria and evidence standard, applied to all three. Each product wins somewhere.
↔ On a phone, swipe the comparison tables sideways to see every column.
| Dimension | Wrike | Asana | Celoxis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | Four dependency types, lead and lag, automatic rescheduling (Team+). Critical path with float and baselines (Business+). | Four dependency types with auto-shifting (Starter+). Critical path (Advanced+), max 2,000 dated tasks, subtasks excluded. One baseline per project. | Four dependency types with lead and lag, inter-project dependencies, critical path, baselines (Core+). Calendar-based auto-scheduling uses work calendars (Essentials+). |
| Resource capacity | Workload and effort allocation (Business). Roles, bookings, skills, utilization (Pinnacle). | Project and portfolio workload (Advanced). Capacity planning and universal workload (Enterprise). | Cross-project workload heatmap and capacity planning. Job roles, work calendars, and instant conflict visibility (Essentials+). |
| Time and financial management | Native: time tracking (Business), budgeting with hourly rates (Pinnacle). Integrations: NetSuite (Business), QuickBooks (Pinnacle). | Native: estimated vs actual time (Advanced). Add-on: Timesheets and Budgets for any paid plan. | Native: timesheets (Essentials, add-on on Core), expenses and costing (Professional), billing (Business). Integration: QuickBooks Online. |
| Reporting | Example: monthly planned vs actual cost by project. Dashboards and reports from Business; cost fields need Pinnacle budgeting; BI on Pinnacle. | Same example. Portfolio dashboards on Advanced; costs need the Timesheets and Budgets add-on; portfolio budgets with Advanced. | Same example. Custom reports on time, cost, and custom fields with drill-down from chart to record, PDF export, and scheduled email (costing from Professional). |
| Collaboration and proofing | Strongest proofing of the three: guest approvals (Business), HTML5 proofing (Pinnacle), Adobe CC extension. | Approvals and proofing for PDF and images (Advanced). Unlimited free guests from Starter. Very easy to adopt. | Discussions, @mentions, document version control, and a branded client portal at no per-seat cost (Business). No visual proofing listed. |
| Setup | Spaces, blueprints, custom item types, and workflows. Admin effort rises with Pinnacle features. | Fast start with templates, forms, and rules. Enterprise controls add admin work. | Configure calendars, job roles, rates, and workflows. Imports from Microsoft Project and Excel. 14-day free trial, no card. Cloud or on-premise. |
| Cost (20 users, annual, list) | Schedule + workload + time: Business $500 per month. Add budgets: Pinnacle on quote. | Schedule + workload + time + budgets: Advanced with add-on $619.60 per month. Universal workload: Enterprise on quote. | Schedule + workload + timesheets: Essentials $500 per month. Add costing and expenses: Professional $700 per month. Contributor seats can lower the total. |
| Best fit | Choose if creative operations, structured intake, and scheduling depth on a mid-tier plan matter most. | Choose if cross-department adoption, goals, and simple workflows matter most, with costs added through the add-on. | Choose if shared resources across projects, project financials, and portfolio oversight must live in one system. |
| Trade-offs | Team caps at 15 users. Business is annual only. Budgeting, SSO, and audit need quote-only Pinnacle. Automation actions are capped. | Capacity planning and SAML need Enterprise. One baseline per project. Proofing limited to images and PDF. Costs need a separate add-on license. | Minimum 5 full-access users, annual billing. No visual creative proofing. Client portal and billing start at Business. |
Verdict
Final verdict: Choose by requirements, not feature count
Choose Wrike if you want critical path, baselines, workload, and time tracking on a published mid-tier plan, or if creative proofing and structured intake drive your work. Plan for Pinnacle if budgets, SAML SSO, and audit reports are must-haves.
Choose Asana if the priority is getting many departments working the same way quickly, with goals and portfolios on Advanced and costs added through Timesheets and Budgets. Plan for Enterprise if you need capacity planning or SAML.
Add Celoxis to the shortlist if your hardest problems are shared people across projects, planned versus actual cost, and portfolio reporting that leadership trusts. It will not replace Wrike for creative proofing, and it is not built for a two-person team.
Feature counts look similar on paper. The tier that unlocks each requirement is what changes your total cost.
Practical trial checklist
- Write your top 8 requirements and mark the plan each vendor needs to meet them.
- Import one real, complex project with dependencies and check dates after import.
- Slip one task by three days and compare how each tool reschedules and shows the critical path.
- Book five people across three projects and see who each tool flags as overloaded.
- Log a week of time and produce a planned vs actual cost report.
- Send a request form through to approval with a non-licensed stakeholder.
- Ask each vendor for an itemized quote covering SSO, add-ons, and AI allowances.
Wrike vs Asana FAQs
Short answers to the questions buyers ask most when comparing Wrike, Asana, and Celoxis.
What are the top 3 project management tools?
There is no universal top three, because the right tool depends on the work. For the shortlist on this page, Asana suits cross-team work management, Wrike suits structured workflows and creative operations, and Celoxis suits teams that need scheduling, cross-project resource planning, and project financials in one system. Other tools buyers commonly shortlist include monday.com, Smartsheet, ClickUp, and Microsoft Project.
Who are Wrike’s main competitors?
Wrike’s most common competitors are Asana, monday.com, Smartsheet, ClickUp, and Microsoft Project or Planner. Teams that need project portfolio, resource, and financial management in the same evaluation also compare Wrike with PPM tools such as Celoxis.
What is better than Asana?
Nothing is better than Asana for every team. Wrike is a stronger fit when you need critical path, baselines, workload charts, and native time tracking on a mid-tier plan, or advanced creative proofing. Celoxis is a stronger fit when cross-project resource capacity, timesheets, project costing, and billing are core requirements. Asana remains a strong choice for easy adoption across departments.
What is the main difference between Wrike and Asana?
Wrike puts more structure and scheduling depth into its mid-tier Business plan, including baselines, critical path, workload charts, and time tracking. Asana focuses on ease of use and cross-team coordination, keeps critical path, proofing, and portfolio workload on Advanced, sells timesheets and budgets as an add-on, and reserves capacity planning for Enterprise.
Which plans include Gantt charts and dependencies?
Wrike includes its dynamic Gantt chart and all four dependency types from the Team plan, with critical path and baseline tracking from Business. Asana includes Gantt view and all four dependency types from Starter, with critical path from Advanced. Celoxis includes Gantt scheduling and baselines from its Core plan.
Which plans support workload and capacity planning?
Wrike offers workload charts and effort allocation from Business, and job roles, resource bookings, and utilization dashboards from Pinnacle. Asana offers project and portfolio workload from Advanced, while capacity planning and universal workload require Enterprise or Enterprise+. Celoxis positions Essentials as its resource planning tier, adding job roles, work calendars, and instant resource-conflict visibility.
Do Wrike and Asana include time tracking and budget management?
Yes, with plan limits. Wrike includes time tracking and timesheets from Business and budgeting with hourly rates on Pinnacle and Apex. Asana offers estimated versus actual time tracking on Advanced and sells Timesheets and Budgets as an add-on for Starter, Advanced, and Enterprise plans.
Which product fits creative approval workflows?
Wrike is usually the stronger fit for creative approval workflows. It includes file proofing and guest approvals from Business, adds HTML5 and SharePoint proofing on Pinnacle, and offers an Adobe Creative Cloud extension from Business. Asana includes approvals and proofing on Advanced for PDF, PNG, JPG, GIF, and BMP files, which suits simpler review cycles.
What should we check before migrating?
Check how tasks, custom fields, attachments, dependencies, comments and history, permissions, and integrations will move, and plan a rollback. Run a pilot import of one complex project, compare dates and dependencies against the source, and keep the old system read-only until reports match.
When should we evaluate Celoxis alongside them?
Evaluate Celoxis when you need to coordinate shared people across many projects, when project costs, billing, and profitability are part of the purchase, or when schedule control and portfolio oversight must live in one system. If your priority is creative proofing or lightweight departmental workflows, Wrike or Asana is often the better fit.
- ★★★★★ 4.6/5 on G2
- Cloud or on-premise
Need schedules, people, and costs in one place?
Test Celoxis on one of your real projects and compare it against Wrike and Asana on the same checklist.
- 14-day free trial
- No credit card required
- Import Microsoft Project and Excel plans




Comments
0 responses